CS169.1x: Software as a Service
Armando Fox, David Patterson
—
UC Berkeley
GO » Write a Review |
People interested in this course were also interested in
![]() |
CS169.2x: Software as a Service UC Berkeley — Armando Fox, David Patterson |
5 Reviews |
![]() |
Computing for Data Analysis Johns Hopkins University — Roger D. Peng |
23 Reviews |
![]() |
Algorithms, Part I Princeton University — Robert Sedgewick, Kevin Wayne |
4 Reviews |
![]() |
CS188.1x Artificial Intelligence UC Berkeley — Dan Klein, Pieter Abbeel |
36 Reviews |
![]() |
Algorithms: Design and Analysis, Part 2 Stanford University — Tim Roughgarden |
1 Review |
11 Reviews
|
1
|
Prior experience in the field: Partial completion of the same course on CourseRa. Like: Get to learn a little Ruby - which is a great language. Got to learn a few things about Rails. Dislike: The course feels very rushed, with Ruby, etc. being given even lesser time than in the CourseRa offering. The evaluations (quizzes) don't really test anything (vague questions on theory). The other evaluative components (HW), which were like programming projects, accepted faulty code for the right answer (except HW1, which was a great intro to Ruby). A lot of stuff was just skimmed over or not covered at all. Suggested improvements: Cut out the bucketloads of theory (intro) in the first lecture. Teach us how to build a software from scratch - the programming assignments had a lot of code already written. |
||
|
1
|
This was a fast paced and challenging course. The biggest hurdle was learning enough Ruby and Rails to get the best from the agile based RSpec and Cucumber tools. Once this course is successfully completed you can transfer the agile techniques learnt to other languages such as Java and Python. |
||
|
0
|
This is more a software engineering course than a Saas course. The Saas specific content is very limited. Despite that I still learned a lot of interesting things. |
||
|
0
|
This was my first Coursera course and I quite liked it. All in all, a very good experience. |
||
|
0
|
A not to miss course if you want to get the big picture about ruby on rails. I also take the second version an now i feel more mature and take time to test every line of code i write. |
||
|
0
|
I was surprised with this course, in terms of how hard they push in quality! Possible if you have little CS knowledge, this course is gonna be tough. Not only they teach SaaS in a deep, but you will learn a lot about Ruby internals and some extent of Rails. Also, those not familiars with TDD and testing in general (Rspec, Cucumber/Capybara), will learn a lot. I would definitely recommend this course. It was probably better than half non-online subjects I did. |
||
|
-1
|
I took this when it was on Coursera, but I think it's supposed to be the same content. Really great content and a decent pace. The homework is challenging but doable (although I have a lot of previous development experience). I recommend watching the lectures at about 1.5x speed (not sure if edX let's you do that). |
||
|
0
|
Great way to see all the way through the creation of a web app. Best if you have prior programming experience, though Ruby experience is not necessary. |
||
|
0
|
Really excellent - to me it was the refresher I needed regarding the last two decades of software engineering progress! I will be impatiently waiting for the sequel! |
||
|
0
|
Very challenging & enjoyable course. The programming assignments were awesome. Topics covered are very useful for the modern day. |
||
|
0
|
Even before the class started, it was apparent the class was really about software engineering practices using Ruby. It seemed like a cool way to learn a little Ruby and tools like Cucumber. The main pre-req was knowledge of at least one object oriented programming language. The videos were a bit jumpy but still possible to follow. I felt like there was too much overlap between the lectures and the book. Quizzes were short multiple choices to make sure you understood the lecture. I think the homeworks were by far the best part of course. They were well crafted to reinforce/try/play with the material. They gave you a sandbox that was big enough to play in but not so big as to flounder around in. The exams were timed multiple choice quizzes. The home page had announcements. Kind of. Most things were “announced” in the forums or by editing a paragraphs long text area. Only a few announcements had a date. The announcements had a feel of the plans were “on display” in the basement of the planning office, where both the lights and stairs had been removed, in an old filing cabinet locked in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying “Beware of the Leopard.”Yes. They were there. But it took a lot of looking and re-looking to ascertain what was new.Source: Hitchhiker Guide“. For a comparison with the circuits class, see http://www.selikoff.net/2012/04/07/coursera-saas-class-and-mitx-circuits-class-feedback/ |

















